Six trenches were excavated in August and September 2021 to evaluate the condition of the archaeological remains of the late Roman ‘villa’.
This was the first time since 1965 that invasive archaeological fieldwork had been undertaken at Hinton St Mary, when the famous mosaic was lifted.
The evaluation trenches were located for two reasons:
- to establish the extent and condition of the underlying archaeological remains at Hinton St Mary
- to begin to answer some of the questions regarding the context of the famous mosaic and the building complex to which it belonged.
The evaluation revealed that:
- the room containing the mosaic floor was connected to a wall that extended to the southeast. It is not certain if this was a boundary wall or the external wall of a building;
- the buildings identified by previous geophysical surveys elsewhere in the field were Romano-British, but were more likely to have had agricultural functions;
- there is very little evidence for occupation at the site prior to AD 300;
- the site seems to have been occupied until the end of the 4th or the early 5th centuries;
- Post-Roman activity in the trenches was limited to a substantial stone-built post-medieval field drain, robbing of stone from Roman walls, and other relatively recent drainage features;
- in general, the latest archaeological deposits survive well beneath the modern ground surface.
The archaeological remains encountered in the evaluation trenches show that the accepted reconstruction of the plan of the buildings is incorrect and needs to be reconsidered (indeed, it is no longer certain that the mosaic was part of a building we can safely call a ‘villa’).
Trench 1 intersected with the 1965 trench to lift the mosaic, but also located the lower courses of a wall bonded to the foundations of the mosaic room that extended for at least 14 m to the southeast.
This was probably a boundary wall, confirming that the mosaic existed as part of a larger building complex built in a single episode. Initial examination of the coins and pottery suggests that this took place no earlier than the late 3rd century and that occupation continued at least to the end of the 4th century.
The other 5 trenches were sited on the downward slope to the south-west of the mosaic, positioned to examine the buildings previously identified as possible wings.
No evidence of villa-type buildings or structures was revealed anywhere, although Trench 4 confirmed the presence of a north-south ditch (whose fills produced 4th century pottery and painted wall plaster) at the southern end of the field.
Trench 5 revealed a substantial 18th or 19th century stone-built field drain (no sign of which had appeared on the geophysics), while a Roman-period ditch and a modern land drain were found in Trench 2.
Otherwise, only Trenches 3 and 6 produced evidence for Roman occupation, but in both cases this consisted of solid stony and cobbled layers that give the impression of yard surfaces, or the hard-wearing floors of stables, animal sheds and other agricultural buildings.
A covered drain contemporary with these layers was excavated in Trench 3 and thick mortar deposits in Trench 6 suggest an internal space of some kind in this part of the field, but no evidence for masonry walls was found in any of the trenches.
The evaluation project has confirmed that, if the mosaic had been part of a ‘villa’ building, it was not of a courtyard villa as Kenneth Painter originally proposed. All we can say for certain at the moment is that the famous mosaic decorated the floor of a room within a precinct or compound of unknown extent. If the building complex had wings, they must have been outside the scheduled area, but it is also possible that the ‘villa’ was actually aligned the other way around, so that any wings and courtyard associated with the mosaic building could have been located to the NE rather than the SW.
The evaluation led to a season of research excavation at the site, as well as new geophysical surveys that are designed to answer some of the many questions that remain about the history of the mosaic, the buildings to which it belonged, and the people who lived with it.
The evaluation excavation was a collaborative research and training project led by Dr Peter Guest (Vianova Archaeology & Heritage Services), Dr Richard Hobbs (The British Museum) and Mike Luke (Albion Archaeology). 15 undergraduate archaeologists from Cardiff University joined the excavation, as well as a number of volunteers. We are very grateful to the residents of Hinton St Mary for their interest and support during the 2021 season. The project’s formal Assessment Report is available to download here.
Understanding past societies through their fascinating archaeological remains
Sharing new discoveries, knowledge and ideas
ROMAN COINAGE & CURRENCY
ENGAGEMENT & IMPACT
Would you like to know more?
Neither we nor our partners access or store personal information from or about our online visitors. We do not install trackers (cookies)